Is it true that O'Reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh always blamed teen pregnancy and dropout rate on bad parenting?

...along with many GOP supporters?





If this is true, then what is their take on the Bristol Palin situation?Is it true that O'Reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh always blamed teen pregnancy and dropout rate on bad parenting?
The have all been on the record chastising parents of other pregnant teens, but have been mute about Bristol Palin.





They are a joke and an embarrassment . . . that they fill the airwaves with their hate and ignorance, and that people actually believe them makes me wonder WHAT the FCC is actually doing. Oh yeah, since Reagan and the deregulation, and the years of Bush void of leadership it would be nothing but ensuring that corporate America is allowed to continue its date-rape of the American public.Is it true that O'Reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh always blamed teen pregnancy and dropout rate on bad parenting?
LMFAO!!! Yes this is true. O'Reilly said it about Jami Lynn Spears being pregnant. And what they say about Bristol is that they are just the average family with problems like everybody else and they wanted to pick a VP that showed America that they are normal....lol This is a case of bad parenting. If you don't know that your 16 yr old is having sex then you are not doing your job. Too busy trying to build that bridge to no where or not profiting off that jet on EBay..lol
no that's not true...I am a Fox News fan:-) and they have gone in depth about the liberal views of giving children birth control at school with out the knowledge of parents and the children being to young to be responsible enough to use the birth control properly...


giving a child birth control is telling that child its ok to have sex...but who is with the child making sure they are using the birth control?


schools, state health departments and planed parenthood has know right to take a parents place in a Childs life...


I think you must be referring to the celebrity girls whos parents allowed them to run wild, to move in with men while they were only 16 years old and allowed them to party and so on...but that is a very different story parents are responsible when they allow their children to behave in such ways...





that's just one more reason I could never vote liberal...


always nosnod
No. It's not true that they said that. I have never known Hannity or Limbaugh to say anything like that.


P.S.





Thumbs down doesn't change the facts. Without a link on this site, it's considered a rumor or a lie. That's the way it is...sorry!!!
Answer...Absolutely true!!


Comment...Now that it has come home to roost, it's all ';Wine and Roses'; I keep telling these Cons you cannot have it both way, as hard as you try.
I'm not sure but that coupled with single parent households seem to be reasonable reasons for many of the social problems young people face. I would guess Bristol Palin will face similar challenges but at least it will be a two parent home..
Typical GOP hippocracy. When it is Jaimie Spears, its the parents fault. When its Palin's daughter, it is just 'life happening'.
I can't speak for Oreilly, but I've never heard the latter two say any such thing; therefor, your premise is based on a misconception rendering your question moot.
Limbaugh also said we should severely punish drug addicts. Until he was exposed as one himself. Whoops!
ALWAYS!





GOD BLESS AMERICA! OBAMA 2008!
';Its a private family matter';. Hyprocrites!
Reps are very forgiving people to a select set of people.


They press blame only on other groups, never on theirs
Did they blame something besides Clinton?





Damn. I need to go sit down....
I don't know, show some sources please, that anyone of them ever said that.
NO
I don't know if they did, but I sure do.
there is not a single reason for most things,..tell me u didn't know that
They're all blaming the housing and investment bank crisis on HUD and FHA grant loan programs too, but that has nothing to do with the crisis.





The crisis was caused by unregulated lending, and the law that Phil Gramm wrote that exempted asset backed paper from regulations and treated them as commodities, and this meant the investment banks and swap counterparties had no capital reserve requirements to make sure they could pay off the swaps if defaults occurred, and when they started happening, we started finding out many of these firms couldn't cover their swaps, CDOs, CMOs and so on.





The current crisis is proof that unregulated markets can lead businesses to make some very unsound business decisions, and then the taxpayers wind up on the hook for the failed deregulation.





They can't admit their ideology failed them with something that affects them personally, so why do you expect them to deal honestly on less personal matters?





Note: the total market of such derrivatives is around 620 trillion dollars. That's more than 10 times the size of all of the economies of every nation on the planet.





It dwarfs the money supply, and it is pure debt, and you don't need to be a rocket scientist to know that there is no way there are reserves to back even a tiny fraction of that debt in case you get into a correction. It is no suprise AIG cannot pay off as counterparty to 400 billion in swaps. They never had a fraction of that kind of capital, but it wasn't against the law for them to do what they did. It was just bad business.
YES, Jon Steward outted them. Listen for yourself.





http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/04…



Yep, it's all about Family Values.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnMvIa9a_…